The J-thing ([info]jemauvais) wrote,
@ 2007-12-14 23:54:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current location:SFC Jandakot, Western Australia
Current mood:disapproving
Current music:Aerosmith – Jaded
Entry tags:news bites, social commentary

Like that I also want to be President!
$1195.20 is more than what a lot of family breadwinners in Singapore earn every month.  I see people slog their asses off working 18-hour days and not even make $11,952.  But from January, the President of Singapore takes home $119,520 every month.  For?  I also don't know.

Well, for being the titular head of state, for being a largely symbolic and ceremonial figurehead, and the only time he actually does any real work is if (not even when) the Government screws up, as LKY himself said.

I've seen that Facebook group declaring how pissed they are that the PM is earning $3m a year.  Personally, I don't really have a grouse with that because, if you think about it, the PM runs the country.  It's a tough job.  If I did it, I think I'd screw up massively.  But I wonder what the President is doing to earn $3.9m every year?  Look dignified, shake hands, wave at people, make speeches, carry babies, present awards, sign laws that are already decided, ask people to donate money to charity, and balance on a jeep running around the floating platform.

Like that, I also want to be President.  Where to apply ah?



http://www.straitstimes.com/Latest%2BNews/Singapore/STIStory_186437.html

Dec 13, 2007
Ministers, top civil servants to get 4% to 21% pay rise in Jan
By Lynn Lee

SINGAPORE'S ministers and top civil servants will start the New Year with a pay increase, ranging from 4 per cent to 21 per cent.
This is the second phase of an increase that was decided on in April.

Under the revised salary package announced by the Public Service Division (PSD) on Thursday, ministers at the starting grade will take home $1.94 million next year - an increase of 21 per cent over this year's $1.6 million.

MPs and administrative officers - the elite of the civil service - will see their salaries going up by around 4 per cent or more.

The changes come after the first round of pay hikes in April, when the Government also announced that civil service salaries would be adjusted over time to keep pace with private sector benchmarks.

Minister-in-charge of the Civil Service Teo Chee Hean said on Thursday that the move was in keeping with April's announcement.

'Public sector salaries move up and down with the market. In this tight labour market, private sector salaries have moved up significantly, as the benchmark figures show. The service needs to follow promptly in order to attract and retain good people,' said Mr Teo, who is also the Defence Minister.

But he noted that actual pay would still be tied to performance. This includes individual performance and how the economy does.

'We are careful to link rewards closely to performance. We have increased the proportion of annual salary that is variable. At the senior levels as much as 50 per cent of the annual salary is now performance-based,' he said.

With the pay revision, the annual salary for President SR Nathan will go up from $3.1 million this year to $3.87 million in 2008, the Prime Minister's from $3.09 million to $3.76 million, ministers and senior permanent secretaries, from $1.593 million to $1.94 million, entry superscale grade Admin officers, from $384,000 to $398,000 and MPs, from $216,300 to $225,000 (see tables below).

Their pay increases will come in the form of a higher monthly salary and a fatter performance bonus.

For instance, ministers at the entry grade of MR4 will get an average of 9 months performance bonus, on top of the GDP bonus, which can fall between 3 and 8 months, depending on econommic growth.

In a statement, the PSD said that this round of changes would bring MR4 salaries to 77 per cent of the private sector benchmarks, to which it is pegged. The April revisions had brought it to 73 per cent of the benchmark.

The benchmark is set at two-thirds of the median pay of the top 8 earners in banking, law, engineering and accountancy, as well as employees of multinational corporations and local manufacturers.

This was $2.2 million as of April but has been revised to $2.7 million when calculating next year's pay.


Addendum:
I just noticed these lines from the article above:
The changes come after the first round of pay hikes in April, when the Government also announced that civil service salaries would be adjusted over time to keep pace with private sector benchmarks.

'Public sector salaries move up and down with the market. In this tight labour market, private sector salaries have moved up significantly, as the benchmark figures show. The service needs to follow promptly in order to attract and retain good people,' said Mr Teo, who is also the Defence Minister.

The benchmark is set at two-thirds of the median pay of the top 8 earners in banking, law, engineering and accountancy, as well as employees of multinational corporations and local manufacturers.
So let me get this straight: ministers' salaries are pegged to the median pay of these top 8 professions.  Meaning that even if they don't do anything, as long as the top 8 salaries go up, the benchmark goes up.  Meaning that it is hypothetically possible that the Government just has to care about the fortunes of these top 8 professions while neglecting the rest of the not so top professions isn't it?

Why doesn't this benchmark take into account the people at the other end of the spectrum, the run-of-the-mill Singaporean, like the family breadwinner struggling to win his family bread with a measly $1195.20 every month and no 13th month, performance, GDP bonus, for example?

§ Technorati tags: ;


(Post a new comment)


[info]synapseman
2007-12-15 12:18 am UTC (link)
Seriously, I think they're like paying him off to shut up. Maybe it's a "we give you money and you remember who's boss" kinda thing? Look at former President Ong. He go and make noise against gahmen and in the end, didn't even get state funeral!

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]jemauvais
2007-12-15 04:42 am UTC (link)
Pay me!  I can definitely look dignified and shut up (even if it's not readily apparent from this blog....)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2007-12-17 02:57 am UTC (link)
Hi, I've featured your post at The Singapore Daily [singaporedaily.wordpress.com]. Keep blogging!

The Singapore Daily

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]jemauvais
2007-12-17 06:49 am UTC (link)
Wow, sure no prob!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2007-12-17 03:46 am UTC (link)

Isn't it marvellous ?

Being able to make use of other professions' dedicated hard work, achievements and success over the years to jack up one's remuneration package.

I called it just plain DISHONEST. It's no difference from just being a thief, stealing other people's monies, in this case taxpayer's monies.

That is why I always refer to the MIW as a team of LIARS and HYPOCRITES!

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]jemauvais
2007-12-17 06:56 am UTC (link)
Well, I don't see why they even have to benchmark it to anywhere at all.  I think the majority of Singaporeans already expect our Government ministers to be paid a lot for the responsibility that they bear, so trying to link it so directly to the fortunes of a few top professions is really unnecessary.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Join facebk grp to show your displeasure over the pay hike!
(Anonymous)
2007-12-17 05:22 am UTC (link)
If you are pissed off with the salary hike please join the facebook grp!

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2328922039

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Join facebk grp to show your displeasure over the pay hike!
[info]jemauvais
2007-12-17 06:46 am UTC (link)
But you see, the thing is, I don't really have a problem with the PM's pay.  It's the President's pay that's gotten me irate.

Why isn't there a facebook group for people pissed off over the President's pay?

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2007-12-29 03:36 pm UTC (link)
I think the PM totally deserves his pay. Can you imagine how much crap he has to do? It's a shit job, not to mention a thankless one....judging by the number of irate people wrt this.

Chloe

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]jemauvais
2008-01-03 03:58 am UTC (link)
Agreed, it's a tough job, and not half as glamorous as most people think it is.

The President's job, on the other hand, sounds like a dream job.  What's better, you don't even have to run for it!

Edited at 2008-01-03 04:01 am UTC

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…